Boys'' English grades are up to atenth worse when high numbers of girls are in the class with them,though girls'' grades are unaffected。
当班上女生人数较多时,男生的英语成绩要下降10%,而女生们的成绩则不受影响。
Boys do worse in English when thereare girls in their class, researchers will say today, contradictingthe widely held belief that girls are always a good influence onboys in school。
Boys do best with "as few girls aspossible" in English lessons at primary and secondary school, StevenProud, a research student at Bristol University, will tell theRoyal Economic Society''s conference。
But when it comes to maths andscience, both boys and girls at primary school achieve up to a tenth of a grade more whenthere is a high proportion of girls in the class, Proudfound。
He analysed the test scores to seewhether the proportion of girls in a year group made adifference to the results of both genders in maths, science andEnglish。
为了研究女生所占比例对所有学生的数学、科学以及英语成绩的影响,他对测试分数进行了分析。
There are marginally moreboys than girls in schools, but most classes in mixed schools arealmost equally split between the genders. Proud looked atthese and schools that were exceptional in their high or low proportion ofgirls。
The more girls there are in anEnglish class, the worse boys perform. This is particularly the case in
primary
schools, he discovered。
普劳德发现,这种现象在小学尤其明显,女生越多,男生的英语就学得越差。
Proud will argue that his resultsshow boys should be taught English in single-sexclasses。
普劳德提议依照研究成果来看,男生学习英语应该被安排在一个都是男生的班级里。
Girls, who outperform boys in Englishat every stage at school, are unaffected by thenumber of boys in their English classes。
而女生的英语成绩则不受男生人数影响,她们在学校的所有学习阶段英语表现都要强过男生。
Girls also do better when there aresome boys who receive free school meals in their class, Proudfound。
普劳德还发现,当班上有几个吃免费学校餐的男生时,女生们的表现会更好。
He said: "The results imply that boyswould benefit atall ages from being taught English with as small a proportion ofgirls as possible. In maths and science, the results tend to imply that bothboys and girls benefit from having more girls in theclassroom. A mix of the genders in both science and maths isoptimal."
Proud said boys may do worse inEnglish when there is a high proportion of girls in their class becausethey realise that the girls are better than them. It could also bethat teachers use teaching styles more appropriate
to girls when there are more girls than boys in the class. Bothgenders perform better in maths and science at
primary
school when thereare more girls in the class because boys tend to disrupt the class more, hesaid。
Professor Alan Smithers, director of theCentre for Education and Employment Research at the University ofBuckingham, said girls started school with slightly better
verbal skills,while boys started with a slightly greater aptitude formaths。
"Boys might be discouraged by howwell girls are doing in English," he said, "but that still does notexplain why they would do better in maths and science with a higher